Memory leaks remain one of the most elusive and critical issues in software security and stability, especially in environments where documentation is sparse or nonexistent. In this post, we explore how a security researcher leveraged Go’s profiling and runtime tools to identify and resolve memory leaks efficiently, despite the challenge of limited contextual documentation.

Understanding the Challenge

When working with legacy systems or third-party codebases lacking proper documentation, the typical debugging pathways are unavailable. The researcher aimed to detect leaks—persistent memory allocations not freed—without relying on comments or design docs. This required a deep dive into Go’s built-in tools for memory analysis.

Leveraging Go Profiling Tools

Go offers powerful profiling capabilities via the runtime/pprof and runtime/metrics packages, along with the pprof HTTP server for real-time data access. The researcher set out to monitor heap allocations, examine object lifetimes, and identify suspicious growth patterns.

Setting Up Pprof Server

First, a lightweight HTTP server was created to expose profiling endpoints:

import (
"log"
"net/http"
"_" "net/http/pprof"
)

func main() {
go func() {
log.Println(http.ListenAndServe("localhost:6060", nil))
}()
// Application logic here
}

This setup allows remote access to heap profiles and goroutine stacks, crucial for observing runtime behavior over time.

Triggering Heap Profiles

The researcher periodically requested heap profiles to track memory growth:

import (
"runtime/pprof"
"os"
"time"
)

func writeHeapProfile() {
f, err := os.Create("heap.prof")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer f.Close()
if err := pprof.WriteHeapProfile(f); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}

// Call writeHeapProfile every N seconds to observe memory trends

Analyzing Profiling Data

By analyzing the generated heap profiles using tools like go tool pprof, the researcher could visualize object allocations and retention points.

go tool pprof heap.prof

Using top and list commands within the pprof tool helped identify functions or routines with abnormally high memory consumption.

Pinpointing the Leak

A common pattern was the accumulation of objects related to HTTP request handling, potentially due to lingering references or goroutines not terminating properly. The researcher also used runtime.ReadMemStats(&ms) in a periodic monitoring routine:

var ms runtime.MemStats
runtime.ReadMemStats(&ms)
log.Printf("Alloc = %v MiB", ms.Alloc/1024/1024)

Significant, consistent increases indicated a leak.

Fixing the Leak

With the suspicion of reference cycles or unclosed resources, the researcher refactored the code to ensure proper cleanup:

// Example: Closing response body explicitly to release resources
resp, err := http.Get("https://example.com")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
// Process response

Additionally, removing global references and ensuring goroutines exit correctly prevented retention of objects.

Reflection on Documentation Absence

Operating without proper documentation forced reliance on runtime analysis and profiling, emphasizing the importance of built-in tools and systemic understanding of Go’s memory management. This approach proved effective for isolating issues in complex, undocumented codebases.

Conclusion

In situations lacking formal documentation, proactive profiling and runtime introspection are indispensable. By systematically capturing memory behavior and analyzing object lifetimes, security researchers and developers can effectively identify and fix memory leaks, enhancing system security and stability without the need for extensive external information.

---

🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.